writer's block

solo1y


Fear and Loathing in America


Los Angeles Dating Site Profile
writer's block
solo1y
This is what it looks like:

I’m not your typical LA girl. I am from [somewhere with a cooler climate] but I moved here for the sunshine and my career. I like [some combination of the following]: hiking, yoga, Runyon Canyon, social cause X, reading [Sedaris / Palahniuk / Murakami], listening to [Radiohead / Muse / Mumford and Sons / The XX], farmer’s markets, Whole Foods, and Wes Anderson movies.
Now, since everyone has written the same thing, it’s hard for me to see exactly how you’re not the typical Los Angeles type. Analysis: engaged.

You’ve travelled a lot because, after all, your parents’ generation didn’t work so hard for you to get barefoot and pregnant at 22 and you now feel that “seeing the world” has given you more life experience and credibility. Maybe you’ve even ventured into a Third World country (Mexico doesn’t count), which you can now wax poetic about over $20 martinis.

You think voting Democrat somehow shows you’re a compassionate humanitarian, thinking that the difference between them and Republicans is chocolate-vanilla, when even a cursory analysis will reveal more of a dark chocolate/light chocolate contrast.

You say that you love animals, despite the fact you claim ownership of them, give them human names, and sometimes dress them in human clothing. In other words, you’ve just anthropomorphized them to fill the childless void in your life.

Despite your proclaimed activism in the cause of social issues, you have an unnerving amount of products produced by Apple, one of the most egregious operators of evil, pseudo-enslavement of people in developing nations.  Also, just one of the little social events you’ve been to in the last month could’ve financed a permanent system of potable water for an entire village.

You can buy a nice faux-bohemian lifestyle, you can buy a “green” eco-friendly car so you feel less guilty about those plane flights to wherever, but you can’t buy self-awareness.

I’m not saying I hate you, but SHOW ME SOMETHING ORIGINAL!
Tags: ,

Impossible To Translate
writer's block
solo1y
In 1915, Franz Kafka published "The Metamorphosis", about a man who turns into something else. The very first sentence of The Metamorphosis is

"Als Gregor Samsa eines Morgens aus unruhigen Träumen erwachte, fand er sich in seinem Bett zu einem ungeheuren Ungeziefer verwandelt."

On the face of it, a fairly simple German sentence. Generations of proud English and German speakers, however, have had trouble with the last bit. 

The phrase "ungeheuren Ungeziefer", means "horrible vermin" (according to David Wyllie's translation) or "monstrous vermin" (according to Stanley Corngold's translation), but it's very difficult to translate. "Ungeziefer" definitely means "vermin", but English speakers are far more likely to mentally categorise "vermin" in terms of rats and mice. It makes your brain do a little skip, which is something any writer or translator wants to avoid. 

The description of a carapace and many legs and so on makes it clear he is some sort of insect, so "vermin" is no good; it's sending our understanding in the wrong direction. In 2002, Richard Stokes translated it as "monstrous insect", and the most popular translation (by Joachim Neugroschel) is "gigantic insect", but this is technical language, a description of phylum and class and contains nothing of the horror implied in the word "Ungeziefer", so "insect" is no good. Another approach has been to attempt to define exactly what kind of insect. A beetle? A cockroach? Vladimir Nabokov had a mild obsession with nailing down exactly what sort of beetle was intended, which is probably irrelevant to the point of the story, and in any case, no one can agree. As with all of Kafka's writing, it's less about accuracy of detail, and more about pushing a certain urgent, paranoid mood into your mind. The language we choose for our translation must be a translation of mood, not of words.

Wikipedia has the adorable "gigantic insect-like creature", which, although technically very accurate, is so self-consciously avoidant that it's taking us even further away from the text by thrusting an image into our brains and then refusing to define what the image is. Ian Johnson's "monstrous verminous bug" is probably the best translation, as it covers the idea of being too big, of being some sort of pest, and the word "bug" is admirably non-specific while meaning, essentially, "insect". Even this valiant effort, however, doesn't have the flow or snap of "ungeheuren Ungeziefer". This leaves us with Stanley Applebaum's "enormous bug", which sacrifices meaning for flow, but given that the entire King James bible was written under that mandate, maybe that's not such a bad thing.

There is a very interesting sub-field of linguistic anthropology called folk taxonomy, which is specifically the study of how people decide to categorise the meaning of their words (and things). As you might expect, this is often at variance with the real relationship between those words and things.  There are many examples of experiments run where subjects from different cultures are shown photos of a dog, and a tiger, and then a cat. They are asked which of the two first photos is "most like" the cat, without expanding on what they mean. The idea is to get the subject to determine what you mean, and decide accordingly. The results can sometimes be surprising. People connect words and meanings in ways that would never occur to you or me, and fail to understand the connections we make. And that's fine.

It's looking more and more like "Ungeziefer" is the translator's nightmare: impossible to translate while maintaining both the mood and the meaning. And that's just the first sentence. Next week on Impossible To Translate, I hope to get into the second sentence.

Fake Word of the Day XIII
writer's block
solo1y
An occasional series where I take something for which there is no word and invent a word for it.

child corn - an unnecessarily shocking term for baby corn.

Jimmy Carter Effect - doing something good or useful about 25 years after it would have made a difference.

cowdog - a tiny, vicious, high-pitched, yappy dog that runs away as soon as you stand up.

pialogue - a conversation you get into for the right reasons, but you know exactly how it's going to go, and there's really not a lot you can do about it, and if you keep pushing it, you'll be the bad guy. Most pialogues end with the words "But I love him".

barratron - the sort of person who brings logical analysis to a situation which requires compassion and diplomacy.

twittle - a short text message or tweet that makes no sense at all, even after you fix it up.

fauxtee - an arrangement of facial hair that looks like the wearer was aiming for a different effect.

giblate - a customised license plate with so many substitutions and abbreviations that you have no idea what it's supposed to say.

schmoo - the feeling you get when you realise you've spent the last ten minutes trying to clone-brush away a bit of dust on your monitor's screen.

knibble - that part of your nose or ears that doesn't look quite right.

ovary acting - the various types of fake emotion with which some women manipulate everyone around them.

flubble - that little shudder generated in a stalled or slow car when another car whips past at speed.

Related: If you like this sort of thing, you might like Fake Word of the Day XII, and the official Fake Words page on my own website.

Fake Steering Wheels and Free Will
writer's block
solo1y

In the opening credits of the Simpsons, there is a tiny clip of the baby wildly steering a car through a number of dangerous curves. Then we pull back and it is revealed that she is sat in front of a toy steering wheel, happily imagining that she is influencing the course of the vehicle, while her mother drives badly, because she is a woman.

As a metaphor, the toy steering wheel is very tempting. In a very boring 2007 article on SOA Policy, Rich Seeley compares Maggie Simpson's efforts to those poor deluded folk who think they can influence service-oriented architecture software. Lucky for you, this is not why I started typing today.

It was a toy steering wheel, it turned out. Lawes had a seven-year-old son he sometimes took with him on trips.
...

He said that the President of the United States ought to be given a wheel like that at his inauguration, to remind him and everybody else that all he could do was pretend to steer.

- Kurt Vonnegut, Jailbird (1979)


Now we're getting more interesting. A complicated political idea, a damnation of electoral democracy if you will, concisely delivered through a well-chosen metaphor.

Since your behaviour is already fully accounted for by physical antecedents, any distinct conscious goings-on would seem to be casual* danglers, themselves irrelevant to subsequent events. They would be like the toy steering-wheel which the infant on the passenger seat fondly imagines is controlling the car.

- David Papineau, Introducing Consciousness (2000) [*I believe this is a typographical error for "causal", but I may be wrong.]


And we're getting into the juicy stuff - the very nature of reality; or at least the nature of our perception of reality, which as any violent child wielding a small rock will reveal, are very much not the same thing. If, as some believe, everything has a cause, and everything would be predictable if we just understood the causes, then we have no free will. All our actions and beliefs and opinions are caused by something else, and those causes were caused by something else and so on. If we had but all the information we needed, we could predict what someone was going to do and say to the letter.

This is a dreadfully uncomfortable thought to someone who likes to think he has opinions, but history has shown that uncomfortable ideas are sometimes true. Papineau is not the only psychological philosopher to make use of this rather depressing imagery to help people understand what this lack of free will might feel like.

I read an article about consciousness by an English philosopher once (I forget the source but it could be What We Believe But Cannot Prove, a digest of essays from various scientists from different disciplines who tried to justify their evidence-free beliefs -  the subject of the Richard Dawkins essay was aliens) where she said she had more or less given up on any conscious decision-making. She just sort of let life roll over her, and did whatever popped into her head. The reason being, according to her, that most of what we interpret as decision-making is actually post facto rationalisation for whatever we've already decided to do. Think about that. It's very disturbing.

Your homework: the next time you have a normal, face-to-face conversation with another human, monitor yourself. When you answer, are you really making decisions about what to say next, or does it just sort of come out of you, and afterwards you assumed that's what you had intended to say? In the example of verbal conversation, there seems to be, at least partially, an automatic pilot. After all, if you were to consider your responses to everything, there would be large gaps whenever someone stopped talking. But that doesn't happen. If anything, people tend to frequently overlap during verbal conversation. Watch yourself the next time you talk to someone, and see if it applies to you. Then think about what that means.

And then good luck getting any sleep.


Facebook Profile Pic Translator
writer's block
solo1y
Someone has friend-requested you, but their security settings are intensity in ten cities and all you have to go on is the profile photo. What can you tell about someone just by looking at a profile photo? Find out today!

(Description of photo): What it means.

(Self-shot in mirror, looking at preview screen instead of lens): So insecure that she can’t take her eyes off the preview for a SINGLE GODDAMN SECOND! Do not add.

(high-contrast): Hiding something. Unless you know what that is, do not add.

(holding a beer, other alcohol-related): Drunkard. Do not add.

(group shot): No individual identity, probably suggestible. Add.

(looking away, looking sad): Thinks she’s deep, but she’s chosen to advertise this depth with a Facebook profile photo, so she’s probably shallower than the shallow end of a child’s play pool. Hence, easily manipulated and predictable. Add.

(showing middle finger): This person has not yet learned how to channel her rebellious nature. Could be good for a quick laugh. Add.

(dresses like hipster/emo): Either a hipster/emo or (even worse) wants to be hipster/emo. Do not add.

(photo with girlfriend/boyfriend): Clingy, needy, no fun. Do not add.

(sunglasses taking up more than 60% of photo): Do not add.

(making ‘heart’ shape with hands): Obsessed with appearing “cute” to others. Unless you enjoy talking about unicorns, brightly-coloured socks, ribbons and rainbows, do not add.

(photo of something other than her face): This is worse than having something to hide. This is a complete abrogation of identity. Possible psychosis. Do not add.

(black & white): Thinks she’s arty. probably studying photography or “media studies” at some community college. Very easy to control, but there’s not much of a challenge so you’ll get bored. Whatever. Add.

(newspaper covering 75% of face): If the paper is upside-down, do not add.

(sad face & palm of hand behind rain-streaked window): Even other emos think this is a bit much. Do not add.

(big hair and big eyes peering over Corn Flakes cereal box): Something about this is very attractive. Add, and actively pursue. Years later, you can explain to your grandchildren that it all happened due to a whimsical Facebook profile photo and a sarcastic Livejournal post. Of course in my day we didn’t have Facebook. If I liked a girl, I was forced to exchange bundles of photos via regular post, and register my approval of her asinine statements by taking an announcement out in the local paper.

(primary school pic): Living on past glories, has made no friends in the interim. Do not add.

(cartoonized portraits): Utter self-loathing, wish she was her WoW character. Probably desperate for any sort of attention. Add.

(PG-rated bubble bath w/rubber duck): Whore. Add.

(child in foreground): This person is doing you a favour. If you don’t want to hear long stupid stories about this person’s child, as though it was the first child to do anything, do not add.

50 Shades of Shit
writer's block
solo1y
My name is Gemini Grey, which is ironic because Geminis are supposed to be caring and gentle and I have recently been filling my life with some very un-Gemini-like things. I don't know what my parents were thinking. The good news is that I'm a successful businessman with my own helicopter and I wear nice suits. I'm not entirely sure what my company does, but I seem to have plenty of spare time to pursue my dark compulsions.

I had been trawling Craigslist for a long time. It seemed like years. Because it was, in fact, years. I was always specific about what I wanted. A younger girl, preferably of college age to avoid unpleasant accusations of statutory rape, but younger if she could keep quiet about it. I wanted an arrangement where I would essentially kidnap a girl and abuse her emotionally and sexually in my basement until I was happy, or she died, whichever happened first.

This was the text of my Craigslist personal ad: "Sexually abusive male looking for gullible, confused younger female (18-21, but don't bother answering if you're over 19), who answers to all, most or some of the following: cutter; daughter of a single mother; eating disorder (any); low self-esteem (the lower the better); into old guys; has ridiculous tattoos and/or piercings; redhead; has long-held, well-developed kidnap fantasy; Daddy issues (important); bisexual; finds it hard to get along with other women." It does no good to fuck around with these things.

I never got much of a response. Yes, my inbox was flooded with messages filled with rage, bitterness, judgmental gibberish and dark legal threats, but no one actually interested in exploring the edge of her sexuality. So I stopped posting ads and started trawling the 'Women Looking For Men' section. Very occasionally, I would see a possible hit, a girl was was clearly psychologically damaged, either through some sort of childhood trauma, or because she had just come out of an abusive relationship. However, after a few exchanged emails, it would turn out that she wasn't as damaged as she had appeared in her ad. There's nothing more annoying that a girl who claims to be a submissive but who won't just do what she's fucking told.

I don't remember when it happened, but I remember a light-bulb going off, and I decided that if a girl had some sort of rape fantasy, or kidnap fantasy, then it would surely defeat the purpose of the whole thing if we had it meticulously arranged in advance, if there were clearly-defined areas of agreement. If a girl has some deep dark sexual fantasy about being kidnapped, thrown in a basement and raped, well who the hell am I to stand in the way of that? I replaced the light-bulb and hatched a new plan.

Craigslist claims that there is no way for its staff to track posters. This is not true. In fact, given what they're being paid, it's very easy. I found a post that matched my needs, and I had her personal information within the hour. She was a student in some stupid college, doing a journalism course, probably in the naive belief that it would help her find a job in journalism. I never went to any college and I'm in charge of a company so big that no one's sure what it does.

None of this matters. You didn't come here to listen to how I made my money, or what I do, or why I do it. You want to know what I did to the girl. You want the precise details of the sexual violence I bestowed on her night after night. Before I continue, I would ask you to remember how these women are, and that she wanted all this to happen. Not secretly wanted, but very publicly, in Craigslist, which is probably the most public thing in the world after Facebook.

I'm not generally accustomed to driving myself around, but I thought it would be better to keep the potential witness-bothering to a minimum. She was easy enough to track down; she made no effort at all to hide her identity. I tracked her as she walked from her dorm to a restaurant with a group of her friends. I went in myself and had some hideous sushi, and then followed her again when they left. One by one, her friends peeled off the group until she was walking alone, stepping from pool to pool of street lamp light. I knew where her dorm was, and that I had a 200-yard window of opportunity or I would have to cancel until tomorrow. I am not a man who cancels things until tomorrow, unless there is some genuine reason why it can't be done today, like if someone's sick or something.

I stopped the car just in front and leaned over to the passenger window, which I had opened after some difficulty in locating the correct button. She leaned over so she could see my face and asked if everything was all right. I threw a cloth at her and asked her if that smelled like anything to her. She seemed reluctant to comply, but I used my suave, masterful charm to insist. Of course, it was chloroform, and once she passed out, I bundled her quickly into the trunk and drove home. Then our experiments in the limits of domination and sexuality could begin.

The first day was the hardest. She woke up, groggy, in her underwear, curled in a heap on the floor, chained to the wall. The chain went through a series of large metal hoops attached to the wall, and up to a pulley system I had installed on the ceiling, so that I could make her stand up any time I wanted.

"What the hell are you doing? Are you crazy?"

I had not anticipated the need for a gag. This would be a learning process for both of us. I explained that I had read her ad, and about my dealings with the Craigslist employee of negotiable integrity. She seemed shocked. She said it was just a joke and that I should let her go. Luckily I was prepared for such prevarications. I showed her the part of her posting where she specifically mentioned that any and all attempts of hers to escape or otherwise mitigate her circumstance should not only be ignored, but should be punished. So I kicked her in the ribs.

"This is what you want."

She denied it at first, as all women do, but eventually, after repeated kicking, she agreed that it was what she wanted. After some more kicking, she signed a legal waiver and a non-disclosure agreement. I wiped the blood off the forms and stored them securely with my other important documents. Now that I had secured what the legal meddlers refer to as "consent", I could get on with it, and after a few weeks, we settled into a pattern.

The abuse was mostly arbitrary. I never explained why I was disciplining her, even if I had a reason. She never knew if the punishment was for something she was currently doing, something she had done recently, or some time ago, or if it was conducted on a mere whim. If there was something expected of her which she repeatedly fail to understand through random punishments, she would be totally ignored. Hours and hours of begging and pleading for what she did wrong completely blanked. When eventually she got the hammer in the teeth she had been craving, she smiled through the blood and bits of broken bone, because it's the only affection she will ever know.

We had a safe word, of course - that's BDSM 101 - but I never told her what it was. Sometimes, if I was working her over with a cattle prod or nail gun (I called it a "nailfun"), I'd hear her desperately shouting hundreds of random words in-between the panicked screams. "Watermelon! Arkansas! Palindrome! Eclipse!" Stupid bitch.

Once, I stopped feeding her. I defecated onto a plate and put it into the mini-fridge I had installed in the basement. Then I pulled the chains so she was suspended from the ceiling with her arms over her head. After a few days, I came back, took the plate out of the fridge and presented it to her as a meal, saying "Poo is a dish best served cold." She had just enough energy left to weakly protest, "No, that's revenge..." She was right, of course, so I popped it in the microwave on high for thirty seconds.

There were no toilet breaks. I enjoyed watching her desperately trying to keep control of her bladder and her bowels. I masturbated furiously over her discomfort, both social and physical. And, often, when she released, so did I. I never cleaned her up. I liked to see her covered in her own filth, brown streaks of human waste tracking down her legs, pointing to a growing pile directly underneath her. And then I would release the chains so she would collapse into a heap of her own fecal matter. Looking back on it, I probably should have got the whole thing on tape.

She was usually too weak to put up much of a fight, or even to complain, but sometimes I screwed up and fed her enough so that she could talk. She threatened me during those windows when I removed the gag. That was always amusing. She said her father was rich and important and he would be sending people.

I had of course taken care of the problem of the parents, using my immense wealth to concoct some explanation their daughter's prolonged absence which would seem ridiculous in any other context. It was during one of her listless threats that I showed her the photos I had been taking of her parents every day since her disappearance. Her parents at the beach. Her parents watching the final of Big Brother. And her parents dressed as Alexander Solzhenitsyn and Susan B. Anthony for Hallowe'en.

The only reaction she had to the photos was: "Is it November already?"

On her twentieth birthday, I unlocked the chains. She was too old now, and held no interest for me. I told her she was free to go, but she didn't believe me, so I carried her out to the car and eventually dumped her outside the nearest branch of McDonalds. I figured she would probably want to get something to eat.

We never saw each other again. Looking back on it now, I guess we just weren't compatible. The police came to the same conclusion, but they seemed to develop the theme to an unnecessary extent, even to the point of insisting I divulge the employee of Craigslist who helped me out. I refused to comply. I don't believe that people should get into trouble for being helpful. Eventually, the police hysteria will die down and I can get back to finding a suitable partner. Until then, remember me every time you type something on Craigslist. I'm not like the others. I'm your friend.

Fake Word of the Day XII
writer's block
solo1y
An occasional series where I take something for which there is no word and invent a word for it.

quarm - the brief, hopeful silence between when an annoying car alarm (or phone ring) finally stops to when it starts again a few moments later

differong - when something's stupid and wrong, but you pretend that it's just "different" to spare the feelings of the Americans.

nicemare - a nightmare with a happy ending

jaff - to masturbate not for the purposes of sexual gratification, but because it's cold.

hojack - the technical term for stealing someone's girlfriend.

downlid - a proposed past tense for the verb "download".

mono berkin - on any social network with a private messaging facility, a passive-aggressive message on a public feed which is clearly aimed at a single individual.

woink - to steal something that no one wants.

ad hominem verso - praising the person who made the argument rather than dealing with the argument itself.

mubble - to achieve the absolute minimum familiarity with (or proficiency in) something you don't care for (or understand) with the hopes of impressing a girl.

candy bard - an artist who wearily gives the crowd what they want even though he dies a little inside.

getteau - (pl. getteaux) someone who is ashamed to be working class, pretends not to be, and so comes across as ridiculous.

Related: If you like this sort of thing, you might like Fake Word of the Day XI, and the official Fake Words page on my own website.

Korean Drama
writer's block
solo1y

If you flick across the non-standard cable channels, you may come across a lot of Oriental garbage. There is a lot of Oriental garbage in the world, and they are not ashamed of putting most of it on television. I guess we have that in common.

Recently, I have had reason to watch Korean dramas, which are by all accounts popular. I made the joke that they were all the same, not just because all the actors look the same, but they seem to have the same plots and characters. Here is what happens in every Korean drama:

1. A woman is doing a weird screaming/crying thing. This must happen at least once every twenty minutes.

2. 20% of all the females in the show dye their hair a weird orange/red colour. No one else dyes their hair any colour except this orange/red shade, and it should be a steady 20% of all the female cast members.

3. There is an older lady who never smiles. This is broken up into 'lady who is always sad' (like Eunnim's real mother in My Bittersweet Life) and 'lady who is always angry' (like Su Young's mother in Ojakgyo Brothers). You will never see these characters in any other light. Ever.

4. There is some confusion over who the main character's (or her love interest's) parents are. Maybe someone's adopted, or the babies were switched at birth, but there's always something terribly wrong with the mother-child relationship.

5. There is some guy who looks like he's 15 years old in a position of some influence at a company. No one's sure, exactly, what the company does, but there are tense board meetings and feverish papers passed in hallways.

6. There's a young girl who likes this guy, but he likes some other girl, and there's some other guy who likes her and blah blah blah. You know? That sort of thing.

7. Some character is being judged ill because he's poor.

8. Women screaming and crying. All the time. About everything.

Related: Flip Channels


That's A Strong Word XII
writer's block
solo1y
An (increasingly detailed) occasional series of things I hate. You should hate them too.


  • "I've never had any complaints LOL!" Well of course not; they're not going to tell you, are they?
  • "Of course I know! I just want to see if you know." You don't know, so shut up. Idiot.
  • People who don't understand the concept of a hypothetical question. Yes, I know That Would Never Happen, which is why I used the word "if", you fucking moron.
  • Karaoke
  • You're not an "associate". You're an entry-level employee and the company has apparently discovered the most patronising way to screw you over.
  • "I think I'm easy to get along with" Well of course you do, you shitbag - you're you! Pity the poor fools who have to deal with you on a daily basis.
  • "I had this really weird dream." Well of course you did! Who has dreams where everything goes completely normally? If you never have weird dreams, if the weirdest thing that's ever happened to you in a dream is getting the incorrect change in a shop, then you might need professional attention.
  • People who can't apologise properly. Just say you understand what you did wrong and you're sorry and that's that. If you throw in a bunch of excuses or reasons why you really did the right thing, then it's not an apology; it's just more of the self-serving bullshit that got you into this mess in the first place.
  • Taking a photo of yourself in the mirror so that photo is 85% camera. What the hell are you doing? If I want to know what a camera looks like I'll go to Best Buy.
  • "I hate to tell you / I hate to break this to you" No you don't, you lying sack of shit. You're loving every minute of this. I don't mind you being an asshole; just don't pretend that somehow it goes against your miserable, petty nature.

Related: That's a Strong Word XI (links to others)
Tags: ,

All The Single Ladies
writer's block
solo1y

On the 9th January, ABC broadcast episode 2 of season 16 of The Bachelor, a terrible show which always brings in high numbers.  I'll be watching it, or at least downloading it afterwards. I don't even know why.

The Setup:

The producers find some rich, pretty guy who wants to find a girl to marry. The producers source a bunch of exclusively white women who are looking for a man to marry and they fight over him until one of them "wins". No bachelor has married the winning contestant in the entire previous fifteen seasons of this reality show, but whatever. Sixteenth time lucky.

The Problems:

1. The Bachelor: This season's beau is a likeable halfwit called Ben who co-owns and runs a vineyard in Sonoma, California. However, given that he seems to spend all his time dating women and screwing around on reality TV during what he readily admits is an extremely narrow window of harvest, one would be justified in questioning just how "co-" he "runs" the business. Ben was a contestant on last year's The Bachelorette, where Ashley Hebert turned down his offer of marriage the day after "road-testing" both him and JP (whom she seems to be marrying) as the camera pulled out of a candles-and-rose-petals bedroom in a scene which made me feel unwell (and I was fine with The Exorcist).

2. The Girls: I never had sisters, but I am aware of the concept. If you don't, let's all pretend that you have three sisters, who are average girls. Now let's say that they all want to go to the club and there's only one dress, into which they all fit. At some point during the ensuing melee, the mood would lurch violently from caring about the club towards eliminating the competition for the dress.

Now, let's take away your sisters and imagine twenty-five ambitious, fame-hungry young women specifically chosen to favour the emotionally unstable and/or psychologically damaged. Now let's imagine that you encourage them to get drunk with permanently and freely available alcohol. Now let's imagine that instead of a night-club, they're interested in a man, and instead of a dress, the avatar of this goal is network reality TV hegemony. OK? Good.

3. The Editing: Obvious musical cues are plonked on top of otherwise harmless exchanges, or conversations which would take on altogether a different hue if a different musical cue were placed on top of it. That's not canny editing; that's crass psychological manipulation. I don't mind a bit of psychological manipulation (for instance I felt like shit when Sherlock Holmes hurt himself in the last episode of BBC's glorious Sherlock, which was all down to the editing and music cues), but The Bachelor uses this so much that it's grating. "Feel happy now! Feel sad now! This is an energetic bit! This is sad again!" No one needs that. In addition, the previews they show you from upcoming episodes obfuscate, both in-show and as a break bumper on other shows. For instance, they show someone talking over someone else's actions, and reaction shots to completely separate events.

4. Unreality TV: The problem with fiction, as Mark Twain said, is that it has to make sense. Reality doesn't have that problem. But the broader implications of fiction vs. reality are that reality not only doesn't make any sense, but it doesn't even have a narrative structure or believable characters or any of the things that make us want to watch fiction. So, makers of reality TV have to find some way to take reality and shoehorn it into a narrative structure, and to almost invent personalities for the people in them to make it look as though they've changed and grown over the course of the series.

It's not optional, nor is it a happy consequent of reality television; they have to do this to justify the mere existence of the show. They have to create fictional problems and get their constructed personalities (cobbled together, as you will remember in paragraph 2 above, from people specifically chosen to be suggestible and easily manipulated) to genuinely believe that anything they do or say matters, that they're learning something about themselves, that they're improving themselves. In other words, they get sucked into their own fictional narrative which was written by some hack at ABC. And why not? They're on television.

5. Me: This is genuinely how I think when I'm watching every second of this thing. I can't turn it off and just "enjoy" the show, however the fuck I'd manage to do that. I like to imagine that I'm training myself to spot these little tricks, but am I getting sucked into my narrative? AND WHO WROTE THAT!?

Related: You Go, Boss (a semiotic analysis of CBS's Undercover Boss)


Jim Jeffries is a Cunt
writer's block
solo1y
Last night, my friend Jennifer kindly provided an excuse for me to leave the house and took me to a comedy show administered by offensive mastermind Jim Jeffries at The Grove in Anaheim. Jim uses the word "cunt" a lot. I don't care about what words people use, but I don't like hearing the same thing over and over. However, he feels that Americans need to use that word all the time. I guess we'll have to agree to disagree.

The Grove is a pleasantly small venue. The seats were individual seats such as you might find at a wedding or a buffet rather than the usual cinema-style stadium seating. We were very close to the stage. There was a microphone and two stools, which led me to wander if he was going to interview someone, "maybe Mariah Carey". Before the performance, someone removed the second stool, probably because Mariah Carey didn't show. You know what she's like.

There was a warm-up act, Jacob Sirof, who seemed like he was just slightly, slightly off the mark of being a good comedian. For instance, he took drinks from his beer bottle in-between his jokes, whereas Jim Jeffries always went for a drink in the middle of a sentence. One looks like you're smugly waiting for the laughter to die down, and the other creates a sort of tension. Little things like that.

Sample Jacob Sirof joke: "What is it about watching cars drive in a goddamn circle (pause) that makes you hate black people?" Which is moderately amusing, but I had noticed earlier in the night that there wasn't a single black person at this gig. I'm not sure why. I've never heard Jim Jeffries make fun of black people, but there wasn't even one. I know; I looked hard. So for me the joke fell a little flat because it sounded like he was comparing his own gig to a NASCAR race, which made no sense to me at all.

Twenty minutes later, Jim Jeffries came out to an obviously receptive audience who started shouting up requests for specific jokes almost immediately. He was having none of that. Like most new media-savvy comedians, he understands that once you've committed a routine to DVD for sale, you can never do that again. It was all new material, and it was great.

He did a (non-racist) bit about sending a black guy to the back of the airplane. He did a bit about paedophiles who are probably better off molesting terminally ill children, the logic being that they can't carry the psychological damage into later life, "so in many ways, it's a victimless crime". He did a bit about actors pretending to be disabled (to the point of hiring "carers") so they can get disabled parts. He did a bit about parents of dead babies, who were probably bad parents, "and that's why God took your baby away". You know, all top-quality, five-star material.

When someone got offended by something, he tried to explain freedom of speech in a new way: "Freedom of speech doesn't mean you can say whatever you like; it means you have to listen to things you don't want to hear."

At one point a drunk girl approached the stage and started abusing him, so he was forced to deliver a string of quick responses, mostly revolving around her presumed sexual promiscuity and how it may be linked to a lack of paternal attention. Eventually she became so obstreperous that he had her and her instigating friend thrown out, to the delight of all.

Even someone like me, who's only standing upright because the molecules of cynical hatred are holding hands, felt that some of it was a bit "Maybe he shouldn't have said that."

And that's a very good sign.

Flight Risk
writer's block
solo1y
Sometimes I find myself on an airplane. It seems to happen a lot. Airports, especially in America, do their best to differentiate themselves in some way, or be unique in ways that takes away from the crushing, mind-grinding reality that your flight will not leave on time. In Denver International Airport, they have a very strange few bars of piano jazz before the shuttle train doors open instead of 'bing bong'. Charles de Gaulle airport in Paris has a crazy central area where the escalators cross each other, making it look like a cross between an MC Escher painting and something HR Giger might dream. And why not? They want to make it seem as though an airport is the sort of place we might actually want to hang out. Sadly, this is not true. Apart from that guy in that movie, there is not a single person who wants to do anything with an airport except leave it as quickly as possible. Everyone you see sitting in restaurants, browsing shops, chatting on phones at airports - none of them want to be there. They want to be somewhere else, as soon as possible.

I was on a flight, sitting on the aisle, with a large black lady beside me, and a small Filipino lady sitting by the window. I told the black lady that if she was ever offered food by any Filipinos, the correct answer was to refuse. They eat dogs, I told her. The Filipino lady interjected: "My mother never told me! I was seven and I thought it was beef!"* She had a son sitting in another row, sullen, mixed race, with hair and wardrobe designed to put everyone in mind of Justin Bieber. He was not handling the mild turbulence well. I told him I liked the song he did with Ludacris, but he just scowled at me. Or possibly delivered a knowing chuckle. It's very hard to tell with teenagers. I shared my opinion that I thought it was nice that Ludacris had finally done something his mother could boast about to her friends down at whatever black people have instead of bridge clubs. There was no response this time. When I turned back to my thee-seat section, I had missed the first part of some consternation.

A flight attendant was telling the black lady, in snippy tones, that her bag must be placed all the way underneath the seat in front of her. The black lady complied with an exaggerated "Have a nice day". The flight attendant came back. "If you have a problem following directions, I can tell the captain that we need to return to the terminal." "No," she said, "no problem."

"You know why we tell people these things?" continued the airline representative, oblivious to the irrelevancy. "It's in case we have to land quickly; someone could trip on your bag in the evacuation and die."

Someone could trip on her bag. And die. That's what the flight attendant said. Naturally I burst out laughing, which was rendered perhaps the more acute because she was leaning over me to talk to the black lady and her face was about two inches from mine. She turned her head slowly and give me a frown. Frowns are not nice when they're two inches away. Apparently, along with the threat posed by a bottle of Coke (competently dealt with by swift-thinking security agent in Philadelphia airport; I thank him for his service), sarcasm and mockery are now banned. I guess the crazy Muslims can now officially stop hating our freedoms.

These people must go on courses to memorise phrases and facial expressions to make customers feel like they're getting a personal touch - that they matter. These courses fail to appreciate that it doesn't work on an airplane when, after serving your drink, the flight attendant's eyes glaze over briefly, until they alight on the overweight guy whose fatty arms are hogging your armrest. She addresses him with an identical counterfeited amity, identical phrases and facial expressions. I just wanted a Coke, but now I am demoted to a cog in the wheel, a nothing; betrayed. Did the people who told her to say those things feel betrayed too? I don't know why they can't just say whatever they like to whomsoever they please. It seemed clear that this flight attendant had been bottling up her bitterness for some time, and the black lady beside me was poking at the release valve.

The Filipino lady reacted with a bit more grace: "I think, in an emergency," she said slowly, as the only one who would be affected by the hypothetical crisis, "I could probably step over it." The flight attendant just moved on, because she just had her ass handed to her. At least, that's what I like to think. In reality, she probably couldn't hear the Filipino lady, because some Filipinos have a very strong accent, living in the half-light of English where all Vs are Bs and all Fs are Ps, and all long vowels are short. For remainder of the journey, the lady and her son were referred to as "dogeater and Bieber".

I'm not concerned with what is or isn't "probably a good idea". I didn't get where I am today by doing things they were a good idea. I want to know is there an official position on sarcasm. When I come across stupidity, especially from authority, I instinctively reach for my sarcasm. The higher the authority, the higher I set it. Thus, for flight attendants, DMV clerks, etc, I will make relatively harmless remarks which will more than likely fly serenely over the heads of their targets. For prime ministers, CEOs etc. I will wheel out the big guns, and spend some time setting them up before firing. Sarcasm is a weapon, but it's not going physically take down an airplane, and it seems unlikely that terrorists will add it to their arsenal.


*She actually said "I was seben and taut it was bip."

Horrorspital
writer's block
solo1y
In 1994, Lars Von Trier wrote, produced and directed a show about a creepy hospital called Riget (Kingdom). It's very low-budget, with intentionally crappy camerawork and a really weird orange filter over every scene. It's about the most advanced hospital in Denmark, an experimental flagship of the Danish health care system, but supernatural madness is about to be unleashed.

By the end of the series, it's popping out everywhere, leading to the climactic final scene where the Minister for Health is touring the hospital only to find: an abortion being conducted in the neurosurgery unit; a liver transplant for a man who strenuously objects to the procedure; a neurosurgeon bricking up a wall in the basement; nurses having sex in the sleep disorder unit; and a severed head bouncing along the floor. Also, there are ghosts moving through the walls, the parking lot is sinking into the water table, the most gifted neurosurgeon in the hospital, recently arrived from Sweden, is rabidly prejudiced against Danes, and Udo Kier plays the head of a new-born baby who might just be the antichrist. It's in Danish, but it's worth hunting down some English subtitles for what might be the weirdest show you will ever see. And if you don't get what the hell is going on, Lars Von Trier himself tries to explain over the end credits, always reminding us at the end that we should learn to "tage det gode med det onde", take the good with the bad.

In January of 1994, Richard Ayoade and Matthew Holness wrote and directed a show about a creepy hospital called Garth Merengi's Darkplace. Originally, I thought it was a parody of crappy production values of 80s television shows in general, and perhaps a gentle mockery of the horror genre. Having seen Riget, it seems unthinkable that they did not also see Riget and decide to make a comedy version, for that is what they have done. They both concern a creepy hospital with ineffectual security guards and night porters. They both concern a hospital built on the Danish/British equivalent of an Indian burial ground, giving rise to all sorts of supernatural unpleasantness. They both feature idiot doctors who don't seem to have any idea what they're doing, and seem all too eager to volunteer themselves for ridiculous medical procedures in the name of advancing medical science. They both have oddly-endearing rock theme songs with weird choral vocals on top, that are so out of step with the tone of the actual show, it's jarring. (This is the Darkplace theme and this is the Riget theme.)

Garth Merengi's Darkplace is screamingly funny no matter what your angle is though, with Matt Berry firing on all cylinders.

In March of 1994, Stephen King adapted Lars Von Trier's show into Kingdom Hospital, to mixed reviews, even among people who like it. Everyone seems to agree that it's not a bad series, but the best thing about it may just be that it will lead you to discover Riget for yourself.

The world of dark hospital dramas appears to be limited, but there must be room for more. The whole field of medicine is a mystery to most of us, and we subconsciously treat these modern wizards as if they were gods. There are elements of this horror and hubris in all medical dramas, even light-hearted comedies (scroll down to Fridge Horror). I guess it's all an expansion of that bane of Socrates, the fear of the unknown.

Summer, 1984
writer's block
solo1y
My father was bookish by circumstance. I was bookish by choice. He is intellectual, well read, a functional atheist (although like most Irish people who are functionally atheist, he identifies as Catholic). A debilitating injury, which still adversely affects him at the age of seventy-six, put away any hopes of a sporting career. Sometimes I wanted to have an interest in sports to make him feel better about having a kid like me. Sometimes I made myself take an interest.

I was nine years old in the summer of 1984, the longest, hottest summer I've ever had during my short time in socialist Ireland, and there were many sporting events to choose from. The Tour de France is the biggest cycling race in the world, which in 1984 was run over 4020 km in twenty-three stages from the 29th of June to the 22nd of July. We were watching because we had an interest in the fortunes of Sean Kelly, who lived about fifteen miles east of our small Irish town. We lived in Clonmel and he lived in Carrick-on-Suir. Sean Kelly was very good at cycling, but ironically, he didn't really specialise in winning races. It turns out there are many ways to do well in cycling. If you have the fastest time, they give you a yellow jersey. If you're the best at climbing mountains, they give you a polka dot jersey. If you're good at everything (scored as points), they give you a green jersey. Sean Kelly always won the green jersey. He won these "green jersey" points so often that the people in charge of the points system had to fix it so he didn't win so often. But he did anyway.

We watched it every day on Eurosport, a satellite channel broadcasting all sorts of weird sports from all sorts of weird European countries. The theme tune, which has become permanently lodged in my head, was Tour de France by Kraftwerk, which is, like everything Kraftwerk does, amazing. We'd have the television on in the little room beside our kitchen, and when we heard that music, we'd drop everything and go to the television, and hear things like "peleton" and "failed a drug test this morning". But we would also see wonderful things, like grown men pushing tiny metal bicycles across two hundred miles of French countryside, and still have enough energy left for an uphill sprint towards the end; people running after the bicycles, cheering them on; sweeping helicopter panoramas of bucolic Provence villages; cyclists struggling to breathe as the oxygen thins out over the Alps; it's kind of amazing. That year, Laurent Fignon (the great French rider with the stupid ponytail) won, and Sean Kelly came in a very respectable fifth.

Six days after the Tour de France ended, the Olympic Games began in Los Angeles, less than sixty miles away from where I live now. We used to get up very early (6 am!!) and have orange juice and cornflakes and watch the madness unfold (thinking about it now, I'm not entirely sure why we got up so early, because Los Angeles is eight hours behind us. We should have been staying up late if anything). We were mostly interested in the track and field. We saw people jumping and running and vaulting over high bars and running around in circles. This was the year Carl Lewis first ran, and the last time Seb Coe was relevant.

On the 11th August, 1984, President Ronald Reagan assured us all that Russia had been outlawed forever.

On the 12th August, we were watching the Olympic Marathon loping its way through the mean urban streets of Los Angeles, when my father points at the screen and says, "That's hardly John Treacy is it?" John Treacy was a wiry guy from the same small town as Sean Kelly, Carrick-on-Suir. Sometimes we'd see him running past our house, but we didn't realise that he was running about twenty miles a day, and he was already an accomplished international athlete. And there he was, winning the silver medal, right in front of us.

My father was happy because Carrick-on-Suir is a tiny town and Ireland is a tiny country and by rights we should have our asses handed to us any time we leave its borders, but here we were running and cycling the rest of the world into the ground. When you come from Ireland, you find yourself automatically rooting for the underdog. I was happy because he was happy.

The only thing that makes my father happy now is contract bridge, and it's such a complicated, vile game that I can't have anything to do with it. The only excuse anyone can have for playing contract bridge is that it's a social game, which is the precise element of the game that my father has no time for, so I have no idea what he's getting out of it. I often describe him as "like me, but worse", but the truth is that he's like me, but better.

Political Reference Page; Ignore
writer's block
solo1y
I've seen stuff on national television (not so much the newspapers, where I assume they have easier access to dictionaries) which indicates that people do not understand what they're talking about when they have political discussions. They talk about capitalism, socialism and Nazis in a way that makes it clear they don't understand what they're talking about. For instance, something I've seen more than once is the frankly hilarious assertion that Hitler was a socialist (Hey! It's right there in the name NASDAP!). The following will tell you enough to avoid making terrible errors, without going into ponderous essays about the nature of humankind, etc. There will no doubt be some arguments as to precise definitions and so on, but I welcome comments and improvements in the comments section.

Communism is a social and economic system in which classes are abolished and all assets are nationalised, as well as a political philosophy and social movement that advocates and aims to create such a society.

Capitalism is an economic system where capital, land, and (since 1865- yay!) the non-labor means of production are privately owned; labor, goods and resources are traded in markets; profit is distributed to the owners.

Democracy is a system of government where everyone has a say in the decisions that affect them. This is not the same thing as majority rule, which is what most people think democracy is. It also says nothing at all about voting or how to apportion representation at a national level.

Socialism as an economic system is somewhere between communism and capitalism, advocating government control over public services but private ownership of everything else.

Dictatorship is a system of government where one guy is in charge and everyone has to do what he says. It's reasonable (although not actually part of the definition) to assume that there is some incentive for people to not just tell him to fuck off. In the past, this has commonly involved a massive secret police network, along with open military control of all public services.

Fascism is difficult to describe, but it's essentially an extreme right-wing system of government. Some characteristics common to all fascist governments include: pathological hatred of liberal thinking and the left in general; fetishizing the military; violent opposition to unions or any attempt to organise labour; fear and hatred of immigrants and foreigners generally; blind, unquestioning nationalistic patriotism; use of religious iconography and paradigms; suppression (and mockery) of any kind of intellectualism; elimination of corporate taxes, or any other impediment to corporations or private wealth; overt and extensive use of propaganda; use of government resources to serve the interests of corporations; inter alia.

Left-wing people are in favour of higher taxes to pay for greater public services, which should then be provided at a low cost, or free. The ultimate expression of left-wing politics is communism (above), the ideal of which would be 100% tax and all goods and services rationed to everyone equally for free. In effect, the government would be one massive national labour union.

Right-wing people are in favour of lower taxes to pay for fewer public services, which would be traded on the open market with no price controls. The ultimate expression of right-wing politics is fascism (above), the ideal of which is to have no taxes at all and let the corporations run the country any way they want. The function of government would be reduced to protecting property rights and military adventures.

Ten Questions for the 2011 Republican Presidential Candidates
writer's block
solo1y

1. If you claim to be in favour of cutting spending for government programmes, please explain how you would implement this claim in the matter of the three billion dollars we send to Israel every year, and also the one trillion dollars which has so far been spending on the illegal and counter-productive wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

2. If you claim that religion has a place in public life, please explain how you intend to acknowledge Islam in this manner.

3. If you claim that Christianity has a sole claim as the religion you want in public life, please explain how you intend to incorporate "love your enemies; do good to those who hate you" into your foreign policy and "let him who is without sin cast the first stone" into your policy regarding the death penalty, and "what god has joined let no man tear asunder" into your position on divorce.

4. If you claim that the government has no business interfering in the personal lives of its citizens, please explain how you would implement this claim in matters of abortion and gay marriage.

5. If you claim that corporations should have no impediments to creating wealth, please explain what objections you would have, in theory, to slavery (apart from the fact that it's illegal).

6. If you claim to oppose foreigners taking American jobs, please explain how you would implement this claim in the matter of US corporations effectively exporting entire tranches of the American workforce to India and China.

7. If you claim that you favour state rights over federal rights, and wish to see federal government reduced to almost nothing, can you explain how all the problems you see with federal government would not be reproduced at the state level once responsibility for those areas was transferred.

8. Additionally, if you favour a massive reduction in the role and size of government, please explain why you would not favour secession.

9. As a matter of policy, if you had, say 500 billion dollars to spend on a war thousands of miles away or on a program to cure sick Americans, which would you prefer (keeping in mind that we are aware of your voting record)?

10. Do you know the difference between a fact and an opinion? Please explain what you understand the difference to be.


Related: Some questions for conservative Christians, Why conservative Christians are functionally pro-choice, Science vs. religion and Fact vs. opinion.

Extract from "Reservation Dogs: Memoirs of a Native American"
writer's block
solo1y
I was born in 1976, the third of six children, on the Navajo Indian reservation in Colorado. My name, which doesn't translate well into English, is Matthew Patch-of-Grass. My father, who was Comanche, told me it was the tradition with his people to name a child after the first thing the father saw after coming out of the birthing tent. His name was Running Deer, and he was a strong, proud man, but did not have much imagination. My two brothers, about whom you will be hearing a lot more as my story progresses, are called Luke Puddle and John Bit-of-Dirt. Although comical in the common tongue of these lands, they are perfectly normal names to me and my people.

I also had three sisters, Susan, Amy and Debz, who always seemed to be popular with the artists from the nearest town, which was thirty miles away. My mother told me that the artists were looking for the best possible materials from which to construct their painting materials, and judged the hair of young Apache Indian girls to be the most suitable. They would pay a lot of money for an hour (or sometimes even less) alone with the girls. I never noticed any change in their hair length afterwards, but my mother assured me that their brushes were very small, and we needed the extra money in any case, because if my father stopped drinking he might die. He had a medical condition.

We went to a government-run school in the town. Educational facilities on the reservation were scant, consisting mainly of a run-down building infested with dry rot and an old man call Sitting Dog who wanted to teach us the "old ways". We all thought he was crazy, but he kept trying to convince us that Indians were "closer to the earth" and more in tune with nature. He said there were secret ways to bring the rains, or to make crops grow, and so on, along with more sinister implications that he could curse a neighbour's crops also, if he wanted to. My mother tolerated his foolishness, but my father told us to stay the hell away from him, because he was up to no good.

Every so often, some policemen from the town would come to talk with Sitting Dog because he was so wise and knowledgeable. He was helping them with their enquiries. There was always some criminal activity on the reservation, mercifully mostly low-level petty theft. One day, the police came and took him away. He must have proved to be indispensible to their investigations because we never saw him again. My father told me that he was a special police man in Washington D.C., which was the American embassy. He got regular reports from Sitting Dog on how things were going, and there were photos of him in his uniform which we could not see due to matters of national security. It seemed to make sense at the time, because we were children, but in retrospect he probably didn't want to rob us of the rite of passage for all Navajo children, the rebellion against authority which usually took the form of stoning some police cars.

My father's father, my grandfather, was called Raining Men. Obviously, he was named long before the disco song became popular, and his parents would have no way to know that his name would form an instant association with promiscuous homosexual sex in the minds of all who were introduced to him. John Bit-of-Dirt jokingly suggested that he rename himself Elton John, which he proceeded to do against the stern advice of all. One night he was watching television in his caravan and Elton John came on singing Benny and the Jets. It was one of his concerts from the early 1970s, with the large glasses and glam rock outfit. We had being trying to explain this to my grandfather for years, but he didn't understand. He looked at Elton John, and then to us. He sat back in his old bakelite chair which used to be a counter-top before the government told us we had to throw them out due to a strong risk of ovarian cancer. He sat back, and sighed gently. Then he looked at us again, put his hands on his knees, and got up. He went out the door, slowly hobbled the three steps from the caravan to the muddy ground, disappeared into the brush, and shot himself. We weren't sure what to do with the headstone of his grave, but eventually we settled on 'Elton "Raining Men" John'.

I remembered when Elton John got that television first. It was soon after electricity came to our village, in 1985. I was nine years old. Some men came from the embassy and told us that it would be good for progress, and there were government programmes to help us pay for it, and so on. No one believed them. Any time a white man said something to us, it was a lie. This was the guiding force behind all our dealings with the embassy. My father admitted that this principle had no release valve for when a white man told the truth, as happened every so often. In those rare cases, we would be driven to demand that the white man recant the earlier truth, so we could consider it a lie, and proceed normally. To do otherwise would be to admit that our entire belief system for dealing with white people was fundamentally flawed, and that maybe we had been judging these pale colonial people too harshly ever since 1492. The elders of the village spent the day at Hanging Rock while the men from the embassy installed the electricity. When the white men asked where our leaders were, we told them they had gone away to maintain plausible deniability in the event that this was some sort of colonial plan to spy on us. When they asked us with false incredulity why they would want to spy on us, we replied that they might want to know our plans for rebellion and revolution. They laughed out loud at this, and shouted at us that they were doubtful of our ability to organise sexual activity in a brothel. They didn't phrase it like that, but the implication was clear. Their frenzied, feverish attempts to distract us from their machinations did not work, however, because we are a proud and noble people.

Over the following weeks, the rest of the tribe were using the electricity for more mundane tasks like cutting keys or winding back the odometers on our Ford pick-up trucks, but my grandfather had vision. He decided to buy a television. He said he wanted to keep up with the news of the outside world, and in particular from the embassy, but any time we saw him, he was watching Dallas. Dallas was a show popular among white people about a bunch of white people having sex on stolen land and selling oil to Arabs. The show incensed my grandfather so much that he watched every single episode and all the repeats. He wrote a letter to the embassy once, complaining about the show's insensitivity to the native inhabitants of Dallas, and what effect this casual re-writing of history might have on children. He got an answer too, which said he should take it up with CBS, which was, it seems, the particular branch of the embassy in charge of racism. So he forwarded the message to CBS, with the note from the embassy attached. He received a reply in two weeks (which back then was a very short time to get a reply from anyone about anything) which stated, in a very roundabout way, that most children would be in bed by the time Dallas was airing, and if any children were allowed up to watch it, the problem lay not with the network, but with the parents. Elton John was so pleased with this answer that he framed the letter and hung it over the television. Every time Dallas came on, he would look over to me and my brothers, wink knowingly, and say that if he was our father, he would be a very bad parent for letting us watch it.

He got married very young, back when he was Raining Men, to a very pretty young Apache girl called Annette Smith. They had two children and then she went away. We never knew what happened and he never seemed interested in explaining further. I still don't know if she's dead or alive. All I know is that she "went away" when my father was very young. Maybe she went to the embassy and got a job like Sitting Dog. To Elton, getting a job was like a death of the spirit. We would mention employment prospects in hushed tones when we were around him, or any of the old people, who felt very much like him. There was one photo of Elton and Annette, sitting on the headboard of the bed, facing the wall. Sometimes, when he got very drunk, he would show us the photo and scream at us, "Look at that! Isn't she beautiful? Look at her! I had that. I did that. I did that! And then she went away." She was certainly very pretty, although she did have a slightly confused look, as though she had just woken up. Sitting Dog once told us that she was like that all the time, by which I understood that she slept a lot, perhaps due to anemia. Back then, anemia was a disease that only affected women, like Repetitive Strain Injury these days, or gonorrhea.

My grandfather never turned the television off. He had it on all during the night, with the sound turned down. He was afraid that somehow the technology (which he regarded as a concrete entity rather than an abstract concept) would "fail" and it might not come back on again. As soon as Dallas was over, he turned the sound down and put a tablecloth over the set. You could still see the patterns of light and dark dancing around inside the tablecloth, but it didn't bother him, so it didn't bother us. These days, of course, you can just put the television on standby.

When he wasn't watching Dallas, he was watching games of American football. Apparently he was under the assumption that the NFL existed within the fictional world of Dallas due to a misapprehension regarding the status of the Dallas Cowboys. He treated all the games as though they were an elaborate spin-off of Dallas, and as far as we knew, he was correct. It wasn't until much later that we realised the NFL was a separate entity which existed in the real world. I remember as a child hearing one of the players, William Perry, referred to as "The Refrigerator". The fridge in our caravan was tiny, and I remember thinking, every time I heard them talking about him on the television, "I hope he doesn't get knocked over!"

When I was young, my brothers and I used to be part of a small gang of kids. My mother used to call us the Reservation Dogs, because we used to often make secret plans and so on, and maybe dogs do that too. I don't know that much about dogs, to be honest. There were always a few bedraggled mongrels padding around the caravans in the mud after heavy rain. We used to chase them around and light their tails on fire, just as a joke. There wasn't much to do in the reservation before we old enough to drink.

I remember the day my mother went away. She was a Sioux named Susan Jones, but everyone called her Su-Su. I never knew her parents, but always imagined them to be Welsh miners, forever nervously glancing at the canary in the cage beside them as they worked four miles underground. My youthful imagination had them developing neck injuries and scoliosis from constantly craning around to check the canary, which would always be fine. Of course, this was back before Indians were allowed to be Welsh, so my dreams were pure fantasy. Nowadays, some of the best people in the world are Welsh, including Catherine Zeta Jones, Tom Jones and some other people called Jones. But not my mother, who despite her name, was in fact an American Indian.

She came into our room that day, and said goodbye to us. We didn't think much of it, because she was always threatening to leave, and she always came back. Sometimes she made it as far as the bus station, but then the bus would be late, and by the time the bus arrived she would have changed her mind, or my father would have sobered up and sent some men to retrieve her. I regret not making eye contact with her that day, but in my defence I was on my way to a new high score on Centipede on my Atari 2600. My father, ever the lovable rogue, was in an alcoholic stupor. She screamed something at him in her native language, dragging her broken suitcase behind her. He tried crawling after her, but threw up on the steps of the caravan and passed out.

Sitting Dog told us that some people from the embassy turned up in the Big Field many years ago, when he was our age, running around in big suits. He asked them what they were doing, and they said they were training for a NASA mission to the moon. He asked if they could send a message to the moon from the native people of this proud nation, and they agreed, because it meant they qualified for more government funding. He sent the message in Navajo, but they didn't have time to translate it because they were very busy with the zero-gravity toilet mechanism, which kept breaking down (cue humour-deficient NASA engineers joking about bored astronauts "going through the motions"). Eventually they got around to translating Sitting Dog's message for the moon: "Beware of these white-suited people! They will steal your land!"

We were all expected to laugh at that story, even though it was more depressing than funny. We all laughed. We kept laughing long after it was reasonable to stop, because no one wanted to be the first person to stop laughing. Sitting Dog was notorious for his peculiar punishments for children who were not paying attention, or, weirdly, who were paying too much attention. Whoever stopped laughing first might be sent to poke a beaver with a spoon, or something more ridiculous. Beavers might look cute, but you don't want to poke one with a spoon. Also, you don't get many beavers in the desert. Most of us were hoping that we were in some sort of arcane training regime, like in the Hollywood movies, where the students have to perform a number of humiliating and meaningless tasks, but later discover that it was an integral part of the learning process. That never happened to us. We were just sent around the reservation making fools of ourselves, for no reason.

After what seemed like a week, one of my friends, Running Water, stopped laughing. He was sent to the tree beside the well and told not to come back until he had lodged a frisbee between two of the upper branches. He was still there at four o'clock, when we were walking home from lessons, ineffectually throwing the frisbee into the tree and watching with increasing frustration as it slid its way harmlessly from branch to branch, and onto the ground. The punishments were meted and executed randomly. He said later that it would prepare us for how random life outside the reservation was. None of us moved out of the reservation, though, so the whole thing seems as pointless in retrospect as it did at the time.

Our village chief (who may not be named in this or any publications due to very strict cultural taboos, although the publishers also insisted on removing his name for legal reasons) died in 1980, when I was four years old. Before he died, as is the custom of our people, he was able to name his successor. His breathing was very bad, and the elders of the village had to lean close to hear the answer to their question, "Who should be our next chief?". Although everyone agreed that he had definitely named my father, Running Deer, there was a heated debate that night about whether he had said "How about Running Deer" or "Anyone but Running Deer". My father lobbied frantically all night with gifts of vodka bottles and tickets to see Mama Mia, and by the following morning he was proclaimed chief of our reservation, with all the rights and privileges pertaining thereunto, inter alia, etc. ad infinitum. This was also very exciting for me, as it meant I was the eldest son of a chief, and would surely have my pick of the finest young ladies Hollywood had to offer. Soon afterwards, my dream came knocking at my back door, with the runaway success of Kevin Costner's Dances With Wolves.



"The Turning Point" by Fritjof Capra
writer's block
solo1y
Review of Chapter One, Part One: Sophoclean Irony

It's full of interesting ideas, and I'm very much in favour of the pro-feminist hippie message, but he's wrong about a lot of stuff. Not wrong "in my opinion"; just wrong. Despite the fact that he's clearly making an effort to be as vague as possible, perhaps not having enough conviction in his own points, he does occasionally make solid statements and predictions which can be refuted.

For instance, Fritjof predicted that Peak Oil would occur in 2000. This was incorrect; Peak Oil is nowhere near occurring even now, and it looks like it might not happen at all, or if it does, it will be in a highly modified form.

He predicted that spikes in oil prices would be caused by shortages. This was incorrect; price spikes in oil are almost exclusively caused by speculators trading commodities in regulation-free markets.

He predicted that feminism would be the most important driving force of society since industrialisation. This was incorrect; feminism achieved most (but not all!) of its equality goals in the 1960s, and now Third Wave feminism is mostly highly-politicised demagoguery which most women reject as unrepresentative of their interests.

He talks about quantum physics having a "relation to the human mind". This is incorrect; quantum physics has nothing at all to do with the human mind, consciousness or the thought process - it is a system for predicting the behaviour of sub-atomic particles and nothing else. He praises the "intuitive wisdom" of American Indian cultures, and primitive cultures in general. This is an insultingly romanticised view of primitive cultures, which most American Indians reject as patronising.

He talks about primitive cultures having a "highly refined awareness of the environment". This is incorrect; there are many, many examples of primitive cultures having so little understanding of their environment that they effectively wiped themselves out. The most famous example that I can think of is the Rapa Nui culture on Easter Island, whose misunderstanding of the basic relationship between resources and consumption effectively led them to cultural suicide.

He claims that a massive cultural transformation is occurring right now (1982). This has, at worst, completely failed to materialise, and at best been greatly overstated. It is a recurring error of cultural commentators (and others e.g. Pastor Harold Camping) to think that the times they're living in are very important, or in some way cataclysmic. This almost never turns out to be true. Ironically, people who are ACTUALLY living in cataclysmic times are usually too busy (maybe getting killed) to reflect on how amazing their milieu is.

He claims that the "antinuclear movement ... is likely to become one of the most powerful political forces of this decade", which of course was the 1980s. He was incorrect about that, too. Gorbachev pretty much castrated the antinuclear movement when he unilaterally decided to decommission everything in 1986. As for energy policy, no one pays any attention to antinuclear lobbies now. Even after the disaster in Japan, no one regards it as politically viable to suggest shutting down the nuclear reactors in the US.


Review of Chapter One, Part Two: Regular Irony

In another part of this chapter he trashes the idea of using money to determine value, and then complains that women are not being paid for working in the home.

He points out that people have always seen themselves and the world in terms of the most current scientific understanding, (so when Newton was around, people saw the world and themselves as machines and machine parts, nowadays we are likely to hear human brains described in terms of computers, etc.) while ignoring the fact that he's doing the same thing.

He talks about how scientists had to rework their understanding of reality after quantum physics was discovered, while rejecting the very same scientific method they used to rework that understanding. There are many more examples.


Review of Chapter One, Part Three: Non-Ironic Fail

He may have the Chinese philosophy stuff correct. I don't know enough about that to judge. But if he's taken the same attention to detail that he has about the other stuff, he's made mistakes. And it goes on and on. I'm not going to list all the nail-downable mistakes he's made, but there are many. And there are many more mistakes made in a much more vague sort of way, that are impossible to nail down, but they are mistakes anyway.

There is a general feeling throughout the book that the "ancient Chinese" way of doing things was more harmonious to body and mind and so on; that their way was better than our materialist, Western, technology-driven civilisation. However, in ancient China, slavery was common, they lived in a constant state of war, women were regarded as property, sanitation was a pipe dream (geddit?) and life expectancy was something like 35 years. So let's not get too misty-eyed about how amazing these people's lives were. Their lives sucked. Their lives were short and brutal and filled with hunger and poverty and stupidity.

There is also a disturbing trend in New Age books that I've noticed, not just in The Turning Point, but pretty much all of them: while trashing scientific advances which allow us to read their books in relative peace, health and security, they then turn around and use that same science to bolster their mystical theories. For instance, a common idea in these books is that "modern medecine/engineering/chemistry/physics/biology/etc. has only recently come around to realise that the Ancient Peoples were right all along". Well, fancy that! All that work and time and effort put into the scientific method, all those years of research at universities and all they had to do was drive into the desert and ask the guy with the most feathers on his head. As you can tell, I find this sort of thing very frustrating.

He talks about the opposing forces in Arthur Koestler's "holons", which are so axiomatic as to be irrelevant, namely that discrete biological units have a need to both assert themselves as biological units and to act as part of a greater whole. He then goes on to make the tired connection with people, that we need to assert blah while also community blah. WE GET IT. We got it about 80 years before The Turning Point was written, when Freud explained these psychological impulses. This is not revolutionary information.

He talks about modern competition hurting society to the detriment of what could happen through co-operation. He's certainly correct about that, but he blames yangish tendencies instead of the real problem - free market capitalism. Free market capitalism rewards greed and ambition without restraint. The good news is that science is not a concomitant of free market capitalism; it's nothing to do with it at all.


Review of Chapter Two: I Didn't Make It That Far

Fake Word of the Day XI
writer's block
solo1y
An occasional series where I take something for which there is no word and invent a word for it.

Poodge - When someone who asks you to guess something is obviously disappointed when you guess correctly.

Aristocom - The kind of joke that only other comedians find funny.

Vagilinte [vaj eh LIN tee] - A female vigilante.

Sickelganger - Someone who seems to have the same health problems you have.

Mistalgia - A feeling of nostalgia for something that didn't happen to you.

Abercrombing - Trying to impress someone who doesn't give a shit, like lying to your dentist.

Ploybay - a recognisable brand-name in a TV show, sufficiently altered to avoid a lawsuit.

Fluttershy - A humorously anti-climactic sneeze.

Phonytail - A fake ponytail, and by extension, any artificial hair girls put on themselves.

Pet Satiety - When you've finally had enough of the endless series of pointless chores that masquerades as a "game" on certain Facebook apps, like Pet Society or Farmville.

Renopause - The gap between the start of a slightly reworked live song and the applause of recognition.

Wine Bluff - Someone who refers to wine in abstract human terms (cheeky, indolent, etc.), but who has no friends.

Related: Fake Word of the Day X (links to the others) and the official Fake Words homepage.

That's a Strong Word XI: 'Stupid Shit People Say' Edition
writer's block
solo1y
An (increasingly detailed) occasional series of things I hate. You should hate them too.

  • "Honestly, I just think blah blah." If you have to pre-label it as honesty, I will immediately disregard everything else you say. It's for your own good.

  •  
  • People who introduce me to their children (or friends) who turn out to be retarded, but who gave me no heads up. I have no objection to retards, I just don't like surprises. I have a right to be informed of any social situation which might require either a certain reaction or the suppression of an otherwise natural reaction. "By the way, Sarah has a massive thing on her nose. Try not to stare at it." See? How hard is that?

  •  
  • "I just want you to know something." As opposed to the rest of your grandiloquent output? In future, just tell me in advance, on a scale from one to five, how important the next sentence is going to be.

  •  
  • "Research shows / It's been proven..." Really? SHOW ME! Jesus. Why the fuck would I just take your word for it? It's insulting that you would assume I'm as gullible as you, and it's arrogant to think that something is "proven" just because you believe it.

  •  
  • "Muslims this, Muslims that..." Believe me, I hate Islam as much as the next person who doesn't know anything about it, but I'm not going to take that shit from a Christian. If you're a Christian, you don't get to say shit about Muslims, because you're into all the same things, you just wear more expensive clothes.

  •  
  • "Oh man, [INSERT YOUR FAVOURITE RESTAURANT HERE] has the best tacos/sushi/hot dogs! They're just amazing. You have to try them!" No I don't. I don't have to do anything. I don't even like sushi, or tacos. Why the hell would I want to go to a place that does food that I don't like? "Just try it - it's awesome." No it's not. It's just fucking food so get over it. Thanks.

  •  
  • "If you don't like something, then don't say anything." Once you understand the reasons why you felt compelled to share that rivetting bon mot, then you'll understand why I say the things I do.

  •  
  • "I look for honesty in a relationship." No you don't. Everything about you screams PLEASE LIE TO ME. If you repeatedly demonstrate that you can't handle adverse information, don't be surprised if people start keeping it from you. And don't fucking lie. Not about honesty.

  •  
  • "You had to be there." Really? You came all this way just to tell me that your communication skills are shit? Are you that proud of being inarticulate, or do you just relish the opportunity to make others feel excluded from whatever secret bullshit you've been getting up to? You fucking child. Either tell me what you're talking about or shut the fuck up about it.

Related: That's a Strong Word X (links to others)

You are viewing solo1y